|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: high capacity configuration nightmares
From: Wietse Venema (wietse
porcupine.org)Date: Fri Oct 27 2000 - 06:17:10 CDT
- Next message: Niklas Fagerstrom: "SV: high capacity configuration nightmares"
- Previous message: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: delay"
- In reply to: BLKnowles
aol.com: "Re: high capacity configuration nightmares"
- Next in thread: Lyndon Nerenberg: "Re: high capacity configuration nightmares"
- Next in thread: Marco d'Itri: "Re: high capacity configuration nightmares"
- Next in thread: BLKnowles
aol.com: "Re: high capacity configuration nightmares"
- Reply: Wietse Venema: "Re: high capacity configuration nightmares"
- Reply: Lyndon Nerenberg: "Re: high capacity configuration nightmares"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
BLKnowles
aol.com:
> I continue to remain completely amazed at the number of people who think
> that they can throw together random selected stock hardware and software
> components and feel like they have some expectation of being able to build a
> world-class mail server.
Brad, I think we have a responsibility to educate.
Like you, I was a bit unkind in my replies in this thread, because
the poster was using such great hardware with so little insight.
Turning this into a more constructive discussion: what about other
machine architectures (ignoring the Linux versus UNIX issue for now)?
What about other RAID levels? It seems to me that RAID 1 (mirroring)
would give at least the performance of a single disk. Any RAID
scheme that uses parity blocks will have slow random write performance
because of the unavoidable parity block read operations.
Wietse
- Next message: Niklas Fagerstrom: "SV: high capacity configuration nightmares"
- Previous message: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: delay"
- In reply to: BLKnowles
aol.com: "Re: high capacity configuration nightmares"
- Next in thread: Lyndon Nerenberg: "Re: high capacity configuration nightmares"
- Next in thread: Marco d'Itri: "Re: high capacity configuration nightmares"
- Next in thread: BLKnowles
aol.com: "Re: high capacity configuration nightmares"
- Reply: Wietse Venema: "Re: high capacity configuration nightmares"
- Reply: Lyndon Nerenberg: "Re: high capacity configuration nightmares"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]