|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: high capacity configuration nightmares
From: BLKnowles
aol.comDate: Fri Oct 27 2000 - 06:21:35 CDT
- Next message: Wietse Venema: "Re: RANT: high capacity configuration nightmares"
- Previous message: Tomas Sokorai Sch.: "Re: high capacity configuration nightmares"
- Maybe in reply to: Pere Camps: "high capacity configuration nightmares"
- Next in thread: BLKnowles
aol.com: "Re: high capacity configuration nightmares"
- Maybe reply: BLKnowles
aol.com: "Re: high capacity configuration nightmares"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, 27 Oct 2000 09:19:37 +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt
<Ralf.Hildebrandt
berliner-volksbank.de> said:
> > 1. A UPS doesn't save your can if some moron trips
> > over the power cord and unplugs the server. A good filesystem
> > technology *can* save your can in situations like this.
>
> That's why we lock up the servers and UPSes in a rack where the
> occasional moron cannot trip over cable.
> And we lock the room.
That still doesn't help you if the moron in question has the keys to the
room, and the cable isn't routed entirely within the physical constrains of
the rack. Yes, this has happened to us -- fortunately, we had good software
and didn't lose any mail messages as a result.
Fundamentally, there is no substitute for good software. You can throw
however much hardware you may like at the problem, but if the software is
screwed up, there's only so much you can compensate for, regardless of how
much money (or time) you spend. It would be much better for everyone inv
olved if you instead spent your money (and time!) in places where it could do
some real good, such as getting improved software.
This statement is true regardless of what particular piece of software
you're talking about -- MTA, filesystem, or operating system.
- Next message: Wietse Venema: "Re: RANT: high capacity configuration nightmares"
- Previous message: Tomas Sokorai Sch.: "Re: high capacity configuration nightmares"
- Maybe in reply to: Pere Camps: "high capacity configuration nightmares"
- Next in thread: BLKnowles
aol.com: "Re: high capacity configuration nightmares"
- Maybe reply: BLKnowles
aol.com: "Re: high capacity configuration nightmares"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]