|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: high capacity configuration nightmares
From: Marco d'Itri (md
Linux.IT)Date: Fri Oct 27 2000 - 09:19:28 CDT
- Next message: Pollywog: "Re: Spam Filters"
- Previous message: Pollywog: "banned domain spam gets through"
- In reply to: BLKnowles
aol.com: "Re: high capacity configuration nightmares"
- Next in thread: Wietse Venema: "Re: high capacity configuration nightmares"
- Next in thread: BLKnowles
aol.com: "Re: high capacity configuration nightmares"
- Reply: Marco d'Itri: "Re: high capacity configuration nightmares"
- Reply: Wietse Venema: "Re: high capacity configuration nightmares"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Oct 27, BLKnowles
aol.com wrote:
> 2. Even with a UPS, Linux ext2fs can get tripped up and
> screw-up meta-data updates and lose files, even without
> a power outage (as has been previously discussed on this list).
I don't remember ever reading anything about that, either here or on
linux-kernel. Without plenty of evidence I will just not believe ext2
can corrupt be corrupted if there is no forced shutdown (kernel crash or
hardware/power failure).
-- ciao, Marco
- Next message: Pollywog: "Re: Spam Filters"
- Previous message: Pollywog: "banned domain spam gets through"
- In reply to: BLKnowles
aol.com: "Re: high capacity configuration nightmares"
- Next in thread: Wietse Venema: "Re: high capacity configuration nightmares"
- Next in thread: BLKnowles
aol.com: "Re: high capacity configuration nightmares"
- Reply: Marco d'Itri: "Re: high capacity configuration nightmares"
- Reply: Wietse Venema: "Re: high capacity configuration nightmares"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]