|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: RBL use and unavailable RBL servers
From: Len Conrad (lconrad
Go2France.com)Date: Wed Nov 01 2000 - 14:06:18 CST
- Next message: Lars Hecking: "Re: RBL use and unavailable RBL servers"
- Previous message: Wietse Venema: "Re: RBL use and unavailable RBL servers"
- In reply to: Wietse Venema: "Re: RBL use and unavailable RBL servers"
- Next in thread: Lars Hecking: "Re: RBL use and unavailable RBL servers"
- Reply: Len Conrad: "Re: RBL use and unavailable RBL servers"
- Reply: Lars Hecking: "Re: RBL use and unavailable RBL servers"
- Reply: Wietse Venema: "Re: RBL use and unavailable RBL servers"
- Reply: Andrew McNamara: "Re: RBL use and unavailable RBL servers"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
AAll DNS lookups are subject to timeout, and RBL is no exception.
>If RBL lookup times out the mail will be received.
>
> Wietse
I follow the Lyris list. They're currently complaining about Yahoo's
very slow SMTPD's effectively tarpitting large percentages of Lyris'
SMTP processes, effectively slowing overall Lyris deliveries.
How would postfix react to such slow SMTPD sessions and can postfix
be made more "impatient" to decide more quickly to abort the
sesssion, defer the msg, and free up its SMTP client process slot?
And do I remember some discussion here about postfix or a patch that
caused postfix to shuttle deferrals to another server rather than to
postifix local deferred, so the other server gets delegated with the
fat queue and retry efforts?
Len
http://BIND8NT.MEIway.com: ISC BIND 8.2.2 p5 & 8.2.3 T6B for NT4 & W2K
http://IMGate.MEIway.com: Build free, hi-perf, anti-spam mail gateways
- Next message: Lars Hecking: "Re: RBL use and unavailable RBL servers"
- Previous message: Wietse Venema: "Re: RBL use and unavailable RBL servers"
- In reply to: Wietse Venema: "Re: RBL use and unavailable RBL servers"
- Next in thread: Lars Hecking: "Re: RBL use and unavailable RBL servers"
- Reply: Len Conrad: "Re: RBL use and unavailable RBL servers"
- Reply: Lars Hecking: "Re: RBL use and unavailable RBL servers"
- Reply: Wietse Venema: "Re: RBL use and unavailable RBL servers"
- Reply: Andrew McNamara: "Re: RBL use and unavailable RBL servers"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]