|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: RBL use and unavailable RBL servers
From: Lars Hecking (lhecking
nmrc.ie)Date: Wed Nov 01 2000 - 14:09:53 CST
- Next message: Len Conrad: "Re: RBL use and unavailable RBL servers"
- Previous message: Len Conrad: "Re: RBL use and unavailable RBL servers"
- In reply to: Len Conrad: "Re: RBL use and unavailable RBL servers"
- Next in thread: Len Conrad: "Re: RBL use and unavailable RBL servers"
- Reply: Lars Hecking: "Re: RBL use and unavailable RBL servers"
- Reply: Len Conrad: "Re: RBL use and unavailable RBL servers"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> And do I remember some discussion here about postfix or a patch that
> caused postfix to shuttle deferrals to another server rather than to
> postifix local deferred, so the other server gets delegated with the
> fat queue and retry efforts?
Hehehe ... not that it's very polite, but you can use a transport table
entry to force all mail to a certain domain through another server, eg.
a secondary or tertiary MX.
- Next message: Len Conrad: "Re: RBL use and unavailable RBL servers"
- Previous message: Len Conrad: "Re: RBL use and unavailable RBL servers"
- In reply to: Len Conrad: "Re: RBL use and unavailable RBL servers"
- Next in thread: Len Conrad: "Re: RBL use and unavailable RBL servers"
- Reply: Lars Hecking: "Re: RBL use and unavailable RBL servers"
- Reply: Len Conrad: "Re: RBL use and unavailable RBL servers"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]