|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: OT: DNS - MX
From: Sasa Babic (sb
pharmacy.bg.ac.yu)Date: Thu Nov 02 2000 - 02:47:44 CST
- Next message: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: OT: DNS - MX"
- Previous message: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: Postdrop"
- Next in thread: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: OT: DNS - MX"
- Reply: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: OT: DNS - MX"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I apologise about the off topic issue, but I think I've read about it on
this exact list and now it seems I can't find it...
Someone mentioned that MX record shouldn't point to a CNAME record. So,
is it something that is demanded by a RFC or is it just considered a
good practise? Or am I completly on the wrong track?
I hope my poor knowledge of english isn't showing as a valid obsticle.
Sasa
- Next message: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: OT: DNS - MX"
- Previous message: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: Postdrop"
- Next in thread: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: OT: DNS - MX"
- Reply: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: OT: DNS - MX"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]