|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Postponing delivery and maximal_queue_lifetime ?
From: J.Thomsen (joergen
postfix.jth.net)Date: Thu Nov 02 2000 - 02:59:59 CST
- Next message: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: Postponing delivery and maximal_queue_lifetime ?"
- Previous message: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: OT: DNS - MX"
- In reply to: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: RBL use and unavailable RBL servers"
- Next in thread: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: Postponing delivery and maximal_queue_lifetime ?"
- Next in thread: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: RBL use and unavailable RBL servers"
- Reply: J.Thomsen: "Postponing delivery and maximal_queue_lifetime ?"
- Reply: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: Postponing delivery and maximal_queue_lifetime ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I have read the documentation on
Always postponing delivery
but it is not clear to me if the mail still is subject to the
maximal_queue_lifetime parameter.
In my case a domain wants me as a secondary server and as the primary
server in rare cases may be down for much more than a reasonable value
of maximal_queue_lifetime, I would want no time limit on mail delivery
to this domain.
Is this possible?
BTW, how is that other Postfix configured for ETRN against my server
when it is back online again ?
- Jørgen Th.
- Next message: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: Postponing delivery and maximal_queue_lifetime ?"
- Previous message: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: OT: DNS - MX"
- In reply to: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: RBL use and unavailable RBL servers"
- Next in thread: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: Postponing delivery and maximal_queue_lifetime ?"
- Next in thread: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: RBL use and unavailable RBL servers"
- Reply: J.Thomsen: "Postponing delivery and maximal_queue_lifetime ?"
- Reply: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: Postponing delivery and maximal_queue_lifetime ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]