|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: Re: Re: high capacity configuration nightmares
From: Vivek Khera (khera
kciLink.com)Date: Thu Nov 02 2000 - 11:47:48 CST
- Next message: Lutz Jaenicke: "Re: Postdrop"
- Previous message: jin: "complie with mysql"
- In reply to: Brad Knowles: "Re: Re: Re: high capacity configuration nightmares"
- Reply: Vivek Khera: "Re: Re: Re: high capacity configuration nightmares"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>>>>> "BK" == Brad Knowles <blkskynet.be> writes:
BK> At 10:33 AM -0500 2000/10/30, Vivek Khera wrote:
>> You don't even need to machines -- just two instances of postfix. The
>> disk-spool "backup" one would listen on a non-standard port that your
>> SSD-spool primary would send to.
BK> You could do that, although it would make the machine
BK> configuration more complex. Trust me, you want to keep these
Good points. I guess my advice should be tempered with "if you're on
a shoestring budget" ;-)
- Next message: Lutz Jaenicke: "Re: Postdrop"
- Previous message: jin: "complie with mysql"
- In reply to: Brad Knowles: "Re: Re: Re: high capacity configuration nightmares"
- Reply: Vivek Khera: "Re: Re: Re: high capacity configuration nightmares"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]