|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Needed: Pros & Cons for each UCE measure
From: Scott Chapman (scott
lund.com)Date: Thu Nov 02 2000 - 16:59:26 CST
- Next message: Scott Chapman: "What is the overall strategy to clear out the UCE? How to approach this?"
- Previous message: John Goodens: "Mysql And Virtual"
- Next in thread: Matthew Hawkins: "Re: Needed: Pros & Cons for each UCE measure"
- Reply: Matthew Hawkins: "Re: Needed: Pros & Cons for each UCE measure"
- Reply: Vivek Khera: "Re: Needed: Pros & Cons for each UCE measure"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
The docs are somewhat skimpy on the details around each UCE
measure. It would be VERY useful to newbies configuring Postfix to
have more detailed descriptions of each UCE measure allowed in
Postfix.
For example, I'm considering the smtpd_helo_restrictions options:
reject_invalid_hostname
reject_unknown_hostname
reject_non_fqdn_hostname
Do these ever stop valid email?
Are details available of which "popular PC mail clients" send HELO
greetings with naked IP addresses so we can find out if the current
versions are doing so or contact the authors and ask them to fix the
progams?
Postfix looks like a really useful tool but I'd like to see the
documentation go deeper on some of these areas.
Cordially,
Scott.
- Next message: Scott Chapman: "What is the overall strategy to clear out the UCE? How to approach this?"
- Previous message: John Goodens: "Mysql And Virtual"
- Next in thread: Matthew Hawkins: "Re: Needed: Pros & Cons for each UCE measure"
- Reply: Matthew Hawkins: "Re: Needed: Pros & Cons for each UCE measure"
- Reply: Vivek Khera: "Re: Needed: Pros & Cons for each UCE measure"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]