|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: Bare LF
From: Bert Driehuis (driehuis
playbeing.org)Date: Tue Dec 05 2000 - 19:37:26 CST
- Next message: Michael Tokarev: "Re: POP before SMTP"
- Previous message: Tomasz Szymanski: "This mail contians virus !!!!!"
- In reply to: Wietse Venema: "Re: Bare LF"
- Next in thread: Pere Camps: "Re: Bare LF"
- Next in thread: Matthias Andree: "Re: Bare LF"
- Reply: Bert Driehuis: "Re: Bare LF"
- Reply: Pere Camps: "Re: Bare LF"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, 5 Dec 2000 wietse
porcupine.org wrote:
> > > Postfix sends bare LF's? If that was so, Postfix would surely be listed on
> > > http://cr.yp.to/docs/smtplf.html ?!
> >
> > Maybe it's a broken qmail at the other end, but this is my log:
> Due to its implementation, Postfix could not even send bare LF if
> it wanted to. All LFs are sent as CRLF.
>
> The only times the above problem happened was when people added
> code the the SMTP client themselves, in order to add a standard
> footer. They screwed up, and it would always happen right before
> the "." that ends the SMTP delivery.
Actually, I reported to Dan way back when that his "Lone LF" warning was
in fact also triggered by a lone CR. Mail sent from PC's sometimes
contained extra CR's in the message body, and sendmail passed those on
to the remote system as <CR><LF><CR>. Maybe the LF just feels lonely
because it's outnumbered. Right or wrong, the error message is
misleading (and the cc:Mail to SMTP gateway that produced them was wrong
in a lot of respects). I suggest the original poster look for stray CR's
that might wind up in the message body.
Cheers,
-- Bert
Bert Driehuis -- driehuis
playbeing.org -- +31-20-3116119
If the only tool you've got is an axe, every problem looks like fun!
- Next message: Michael Tokarev: "Re: POP before SMTP"
- Previous message: Tomasz Szymanski: "This mail contians virus !!!!!"
- In reply to: Wietse Venema: "Re: Bare LF"
- Next in thread: Pere Camps: "Re: Bare LF"
- Next in thread: Matthias Andree: "Re: Bare LF"
- Reply: Bert Driehuis: "Re: Bare LF"
- Reply: Pere Camps: "Re: Bare LF"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]