|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: relay security...
From: Matthias Andree (ma
dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de)Date: Mon Dec 11 2000 - 05:43:06 CST
- Next message: Matthias Andree: "Re: relay security..."
- Previous message: Matthias Andree: "Re: Bug? Postfix qualifies FOREIGN headers"
- In reply to: Wietse Venema: "Re: relay security..."
- Next in thread: Matthias Andree: "Re: relay security..."
- Next in thread: Wietse Venema: "Re: CIDR blocks & relay security..."
- Reply: Matthias Andree: "Re: relay security..."
- Reply: Matthias Andree: "Re: relay security..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
wietse
porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) writes:
> I will change the mynetworks default, because most users will not
> figure out from the documentation what is a proper setting unless
> Postfix refuses to relay mail for them.
Wrong, users trust the "Postfix is secure out-of-the-box" claims and are
deceived when it comes to tell "mine" from "theirs".
If you expect users to read the documentation and configure postfix
nontheless, then using /32 defaults all over networks is nice. Rejected
relay submissions will alert users and administrators, and it will
actually prove things are sure.
Please put out -pl12 shortly so anyone who feels like doing so can alert
Bugtraq and CERT.
-- Matthias Andree
- Next message: Matthias Andree: "Re: relay security..."
- Previous message: Matthias Andree: "Re: Bug? Postfix qualifies FOREIGN headers"
- In reply to: Wietse Venema: "Re: relay security..."
- Next in thread: Matthias Andree: "Re: relay security..."
- Next in thread: Wietse Venema: "Re: CIDR blocks & relay security..."
- Reply: Matthias Andree: "Re: relay security..."
- Reply: Matthias Andree: "Re: relay security..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]