|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: Bare LF
From: Pere Camps (lists
pere.net)Date: Mon Dec 11 2000 - 12:43:20 CST
- Next message: Nadeem Hasan: "Re: (Update) Small typo in postconf in pl05"
- Previous message: Pere Camps: "Re: Bare LF"
- In reply to: Bert Driehuis: "Re: Bare LF"
- Next in thread: Wietse Venema: "Re: Bare LF"
- Next in thread: Matthias Andree: "Re: Bare LF"
- Reply: Pere Camps: "Re: Bare LF"
- Reply: Wietse Venema: "Re: Bare LF"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Bert,
> Actually, I reported to Dan way back when that his "Lone LF" warning was
> in fact also triggered by a lone CR. Mail sent from PC's sometimes
> contained extra CR's in the message body, and sendmail passed those on
> to the remote system as <CR><LF><CR>. Maybe the LF just feels lonely
> because it's outnumbered. Right or wrong, the error message is
> misleading (and the cc:Mail to SMTP gateway that produced them was wrong
> in a lot of respects). I suggest the original poster look for stray CR's
> that might wind up in the message body.
That might be a reason. I'll look into it.
Thanks!
-- p.
- Next message: Nadeem Hasan: "Re: (Update) Small typo in postconf in pl05"
- Previous message: Pere Camps: "Re: Bare LF"
- In reply to: Bert Driehuis: "Re: Bare LF"
- Next in thread: Wietse Venema: "Re: Bare LF"
- Next in thread: Matthias Andree: "Re: Bare LF"
- Reply: Pere Camps: "Re: Bare LF"
- Reply: Wietse Venema: "Re: Bare LF"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]