On 01-01-04 Wietse Venema wrote:
> Daniel Roesen:
> > On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 04:46:58PM +0100, Christian Kurz wrote:
> > > I'm currently thinking about a setup where postfix is first trying to
> > > directly send out the mail. If that fails, because the MX doesn't want
> > > to accept mail from a dialup host, postfix should use a relay_host.
> >
> > fallback_transport = smtp:[your.fallback.relayhost]

> Try:

> fallback_relay = smtp:[your.fallback.relayhost]

> The fallback_transport is for users not in /etc/passwd or /etc/aliases.

Ah, I remember having read about some option with the name fallback but
didn't need the right name. Can I also define a port to use with the
fallback relayhost?

> Apologies for the confusing names - the result of gradual evolution
> rather than planning every detail years ahead in time.

Well, I have no problem with the name. I just wondered how the option
name was and hade no idea to search for what option. Thanks.

> This syntax requires a very recent Postfix snapshot. Code from
> before 20001005 does not understand the above syntax.

Well, I use the newest available snapshot here, so this should be no
problem for me. Thanks for your quick answer and thanks to Daniel and
Ralf also, who answered very fast.

Ciao
     Christian

-- 
While the year 2000 (y2k) problem is not an issue for us, all Linux
implementations will impacted by the year 2038 (y2.038k) issue. The Debian
Project is committed to working with the industry on this issue and we will
have our full plans and strategy posted by the first quarter of 2020.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4-1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iEYEARECAAYFAjpU0qAACgkQqeZn/ybMeFORiQCg1ZPeY2eLI+Q/QyF1crUR9xKp M8wAoL9uLzFsM2HFfAbC14sohy7llV1U =Zlb9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]