|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
From: Arne K. Haaje (arne
drlinux.no)Date: Mon Jan 08 2001 - 14:32:07 CST
John Saylor wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I've been using postfix to deliver bulk mail, and it's doing better than
> Exchange [which is saying virtually *nothing*, I know ...], but I think
> it can do much better.
>
> Right now it's on some pretty limited hardware:
> 64MB RAM
> 200 MHz Pentium
> Linux 2.2.16
>
> I changed these settings from their defaults, and while I had some
> better luck, it was not the leap I was hoping for.
> > inital_destination_concurrency = 2
> > default_destination_concurrency_limit = 8
> > default_process_limit = 64
> > queue_run_delay = 8192
> > maximal_queue_lifetime = 2
> > minimal_backoff_time = 2048
> > maximal_backoff_time = 8192
> > qmgr_message_recipient_limit = 2048
>
> What I'm looking for is suggestions on what config variables to tweak to
> improve performace; or will better hardware be the best next step. And
> any suggestions on hardware specs would be welcome.
>
I hav a question regarding sending of bulk-email. A client of mine has a
large userbase (70K + users) that sometimes get sent (solicited) bulk
email.
I believe there is a header called someting like 'X-Priority: bulk'.
How does this work ? Is it something that Postfix use ?
On the same note the clients bulksending application is a Perl program
that pipes the email to /usr/sbin/sendmail for each recipient. I don't
have any benchmarks but it seems to be working very slowly. What is the
best way of sending the same e-mail to a large bunch of users ?
Regards,
Arne K. Haaje
-- -------------------------------- Arne K. Haaje | T: 69 92 04 90 Enebakkveien 2 | F: 69 92 04 91 1625 Tomter | M: 92 88 44 66 --------------------------------
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]