|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
From: Andreas Kisslinger (Andreas.Kisslinger
soc-de.com)Date: Tue Jan 16 2001 - 08:12:35 CST
...[spammer uses a valid address]...
> So what? Spam is spam. If you were to discard it, you would also
> discard valid email of that particular sender.
> He would never know that his mail was sent to the bitbucket:
> Rejecting the mail ist the way to go!
In our case we're having a virtual entry "foo
domain.com", the spammer
was delivering the mail through the MX host (our provider) for this
domain. So modifying /etc/postfix/access for the host was not possible.
The spammer also used this address as From-address, so rejecting (as I
did) bounces the mail back to the MX host and there the bounce was
coming back to us.
Think the following way:
Spammer delivers through MX the following mail
-----------------------
MAIL FROM: Ralf.Hildebrandt
innominate.com
RCPT TO: Ralf.Hildebrandt
innominate.com
DATA
From: Ralf.Hildebrandt
innominate.com
To: Ralf.Hildebrandt
innominate.com
Subject: Double-bounce
wasted time and space
.
-----------------------
What is the correct way to reject such a mail without getting the
bounce?
I've "delivered" this problem to our provider (discard every mail,
coming from "foo
domain.com" and going to "foo
domain.com").
best regards,
Andy (using Postfix since a few months)
PS: Removing this "foo
domain.com" was not a valid way, because the
address was in printed marketing material.
--
******************************************************************
Andreas Kisslinger SOC Software Outsourcing Consulting GmbH
Tel.: +49.89/864913-41 Henschelstr. 3
Fax: +49.89/864913-86 D-81249 Muenchen
Germany
mailto:Andreas.Kisslinger
soc-de.com
******************************************************************
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]