|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
From: Wietse Venema (wietse
porcupine.org)Date: Sun Mar 11 2001 - 08:04:17 CST
Thomas Langås:
> Wietse Venema:
> > You'we welcome to add code, but I won't adopt it, because the SMTP
> > server is already more than twice as large as I would recommend.
>
> Ok...
>
> > Half of the 3522 non-comment code lines deal with UCE checks - that
> > code should be ripped out and put in a different process. Only then
> > the choice between "reject" or "tag" becomes practical, because
> > there is only one narrow interface.
>
> So making another little program that get's the incoming mail, does all
> UCE-checks and returns, either the message (with tag's and everything) or a
> REJECT-message to state that the message should bounce would be the way to
> go to implement this into the actuall postfix-code?
Whatever. If I had the answer to every question, then Postfix would
be a better mailer.
Wietse
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo
postfix.org with content
(not subject): unsubscribe postfix-users
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]