OSEC

Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com
 
From: Rask Ingemann Lambertsen (c948374-postfixstudent.dtu.dk)
Date: Tue Mar 06 2001 - 06:27:29 CST

  • Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

    On Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 11:44:14AM +0100, Andreas S. Oesterhelt wrote:
    > Hello,
    >
    > > Sure. If you lie to Postfix, qmail or whatever, then this elimination will
    > > fail. So the problem is the incorrect MX records in the DNS. Obviously, if
    > > you use NAT, then your MX records will look differently on the outside than
    > > they do on the inside.
    >
    > How about lying to Postfix once more to compensate? Using Bind9's
    > view feature, you could ensure that if the machine running postfix
    > asks, it would get the NATed version of the MXes IP address and thus
    > recognize itself.

    That wouldn't be a lie to Postfix, it would be the truth.

    Regards,
    Rask Ingemann Lambertsen 

    -- 
/ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ\
| Please do NOT Cc: to me or the | 
| mailing list. I am on the list.|

    -
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomopostfix.org with content
(not subject): unsubscribe postfix-users