OSEC

Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com
 
From: Olli Artemjev (ollimetaltelecom.org.ru)
Date: Wed Apr 25 2001 - 10:56:12 CDT

  • Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

    Hi.

    2Wietse: What do you think about including postfix whoson patches into
    your mailer distribution? You may look for them here:

    ftp://victor.teaser.fr/pub/lwa/postfix/

    Related discussion follows (also beginning letters could be found in a
    mailing list):

    On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, Laurent Wacrenier wrote:

    > From: Laurent Wacrenier <lwavictor.teaser.fr>
    > To: Olli Artemjev <ollimetaltelecom.org.ru>,
    > Laurent Wacrenier <lwateaser.fr>, postfix-userspostfix.org
    > Subject: Re: ?: pop3 before SMTP with whoson
    > > 1st: whoson-2.00/ seem to be unable to work with the following
    > > configuration:
    > > -------------------------------
    > > client unixd
    > > port=/var/spool/mail/run/whoson.d
    > Yes. The dictionary only works with stream sockets, not datagram.
    > The reasons are
    > 1/ the user query/answer sequence has to be synchronised. When
    > using datagrams, you have to emulate streams into.
    > 2/ Postfix API does not provide datagram routines
    > On a POP server, point 1/ is less important, so datagrams are ok.
    Ok, got this.

    <skip>
    > Whoson dictionnary does not use whoson-2.0 library but attacks
    > directly the sockets. So it does not care of the whoson.conf file.
    Ok, got this too. =)
     
    > I suspect theyre is something wrong in your tests. Are you running
    > whosond or whoson clients into the chroot jail ?
    I've postfix smtpd chrooted to its spool (via master.cf)
    Other stuff (popa3d & whosond) are in a normal root.

    > Check the postfix log file,
    > the existence of socket files and run
    > whoson server in verbose mode.
    OK. You're right. I did somthing wrong & all seem to work w/o whoson.conf
    in spooldir/etc now. Sorry for a noise..
     
    > Another eventuality is that the kernel does not allow process
    > in different jails to comunicate with unix sockets.
    no. This is not the case - we've named running under chroot & sending logs
    to syslogd via socket.

    > > Well, I think Wietse should include your patch in next postfix release.
    > > (Whould you do this, Wietse? %-) ) I can write short postfix-whoson howto
    > > if noone else wants this job & if Wietse will include your patch in the
    > > postfix distribution.. Hope you have no license incompatibilities? :)
    > As most of the patch is based on existent postfix code, it could be
    > distributed without extra licence over postfix one.
    Fine. :) Let's wait for Wietse words..

    -- 
    Bye.Olli
    MISiS Telecommunications
    phone:   +7(095)955-0087
    

    - To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomopostfix.org with content (not subject): unsubscribe postfix-users