|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
From: Phil Howard (phil-postfix-users
ipal.net)Date: Thu May 03 2001 - 03:51:22 CDT
I have more than that, actually. The whole setting is:
smtpd_helo_restrictions =
permit_mynetworks
reject_invalid_hostname
reject_non_fqdn_hostname
reject_unknown_hostname
permit
I've been looking over my logs and considering my missing mail.
It seems I'm losing much more spam than I'm losing legitimate
mail. So far only 3 domains have problems with legitimate mail
trying to come in and getting rejected. But at least 15 now are
places sending some form of spam. Some are direct dialups that
DUL missed. Most of them seem to be institutional spammers that
are sending mostly to unknown users, but to some legitimate users.
The interesting thing is I have had several cases of mail coming
in to never-existed users, which are apparently cases of someone
on the net typing a fake email address, or misttyping, and these
places neither confirm the address, nor reap the list based on
rejections. Some rejections for non-existant user are getting
past the checking during SMTP and the reject message going back
reaches bad/dead mail servers. What reject_unknown_hostname
seems to be doing is stopping virtually all of this. It seems
that having a bad HELO command hostname is the first mark of a
misconfigured network.
Of the 3 legitimate cases that were being blocked, 1 of them is
definitely using mail servers behind a NAT and leaving their names
out of DNS (for security reasons?). I suspect the other 2 have
the same problem as well. The solution would seem to me to either
put on the firewall's hostname in HELO, or add their names to the
DNS pointing to the firewall IP.
I've seen some messages here in the past regarding some issues of
"pedantic" checks having problems with "real world" situations,
but I think I will leave this setting in place because I feel to
remove it just because some places have misconfigurations is to
at a minimum not discourage such misconfigurations, and may even
have some effect of encouraging it.
Your thoughts?
-- ----------------------------------------------------------------- | Phil Howard - KA9WGN | Dallas | http://linuxhomepage.com/ | | phil-nospamipal.net | Texas, USA | http://phil.ipal.org/ | -----------------------------------------------------------------
- To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo
postfix.org with content (not subject): unsubscribe postfix-users
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]