Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
>
> On 5 Sep 2001 14:50:57 +0200, Roel van Meer <roleklinvision.com> wrote:
>
> > cdb sounded good, but the patches are labeled unstable.. Is there
> > any information avalable that compares these 'tables'?
>
> I don't know of any.

Hm. Too bad.

> > No mail is to be delivered locally. All mail arriving is sent to
> > other postfix servers (50.000 in total) for local delivery there.
>
> Yeah. How? By using virtual_maps?

I had been thinking of transport_maps for figuring out which server
to send mail to for a particular domain, and virtual for the
validation and UCE checking.
 
> > Because we know all valid mail users at this DMZ mail server, and
> > bandwith from the DMZ to the 50.000 is both limited and expensive,
> > we would like to bounce all mail there, instead of the servers that
> > would do local delivery. Eventually, we might want to put in some
> > UCE controls at this point.
>
> Good idea. I ask, because using virtual_maps, you can do exectly this
> with no overhead...

No overhead? I guess if i would just use transport_maps to deliver
mail to other servers this would take less effort then when i would
do additional lookups in the virtual and/or UCE tables..

Regards,

rolek

--
1A First Alternative rolekalt001.com    www.alt001.com
Linvision BV         roleklinvision.com (www|devel).linvision.com
--
-
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomopostfix.org with content
(not subject): unsubscribe postfix-users

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]