OSEC

Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com
 
From: Simon J Mudd (sjmuddpobox.com)
Date: Wed Sep 05 2001 - 09:56:53 CDT

  • Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

    tdiehlrogueind.com (Tom Diehl) writes:

    > On 5 Sep 2001, Simon J Mudd wrote:
    >
    > > o1okh.refer.org (LinuxKH) writes:
    > >
    > > > I have just got install the 'postfix-20010202-4.rpm' from the PowerTools
    > > > of RH Seawolf.
    > >
    > > RedHat seem to be providing their own postfix rpms, but they don't
    > > keep them up to date, which is a shame.
    >
    > In the next release of redhat linux (they are running beta tests now) they
    > have dropped all official support for postfix.

    I tried to get them to use my rpms, or to work with them, but it didn't
    seem to work. Also incoming.redhat.com didn't seem capable of recognising
    rpm v4 versions of the package I was uploading so they didn't appear in
    contrib.redhat.com (this may have been fixed now?).

    That's why I've tried to keep my packages up to date, flexible and
    distribution neutral (although rpm specific) as possible. It's a shame
    it hasn't been possible to improve the situation of multiple postfix
    rpms available with the maintenance that this requires. Improvements in
    one package aren't shared by others.

    > > It might help if you try my latest ones which shouldn't give you the
    > > errors you are getting. See http://www.pobox.com/~sjmudd/postfix
    > >
    > > > ... postfix/smtp[1509]: fatal unkwon service: smtp/tcp
    > >
    > > This probably means that smtp is running in a chroot environment and that
    > > /var/spool/postfix/etc/services does not exist or has the wrong permissions.
    >
    > Last time I looked they had this linked to /etc/services.

    Do you mean that /var/spool/postfix/etc/services is linked to /etc/services?

    Is this possible and/or advisable? I guess a hardlink is possible but
    maybe not advisable, and wouldn't work across different filesystems
    I don't think a soft link would work.

    > My experience has been Simon's postfix rpms work very well and redhat's
    > are broken.
    >
    > Thanks, Simon.

    Wietse's software is good, I just do my best packaging it and am aware
    that for a large number of people packaged software is more
    convenient.

    Regards,

    Simon

    -- 
    Simon J Mudd, Madrid SPAIN               Tel: +34-91-408 4878    
    email: sjmuddunicorn.ea4els.mapr.org    Mobile: +34-605-085 219
    -
    To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomopostfix.org with content
    (not subject): unsubscribe postfix-users