|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
From: Ralf Hildebrandt (news-list.postfix.users
innominate.de)Date: Wed Sep 05 2001 - 10:29:24 CDT
On 5 Sep 2001 17:14:09 +0200, jordir
fib.upc.es <jordir
fib.upc.es> wrote:
> We are using imap implemented by University of Washington.
> I'm going to try your hints.
We were using UW-IMAP here. It sucked. I migrated the company's
mailboxes. One day, then it was done.
a) Performance was bad (it loaded the whole mbox into RAM, and parsed
it before serving a single mail back to the client!)
b) If many users with large mailboxes access their boxes
simultaneously, the machine would use lots of memory. If the
machine then starts to swap, performance would deteriorate even more
c) Security of UW-IMAP is apalling.
d) http://www.courier-mta.org/mbox-vs-maildir/
for a benchmark and a comparison to mbox.
e) As a bonus, you can now use POP3/IMAP over SSL/TLS (encrypted)
No more password sniffing
f) MAILDIR is NFS safe, since it requires no locking
g) Your shell users still can use e.g. mutt to read their mail, since
mutt supports maildir natively.
h) you can authenticate against PAM, so no more /etc/passwd users.
I installed courier-imap, made it use some non-standard ports, then
tested it. After I saw that "everything was fine", I switched to
maildir delivery in Postfix -- new mail would be readable immediately.
Then I used a script to convert all the old mbox files to maildir (by
using mbox2maildir or by simply re-sending the mail to the same
recipient using "formail").
-- ralf.hildebrandtinnominate.com innominate AG Technical Consultant Don't be afraid of what you see - Diplom-Informatiker be afraid of what you don't see! tel: +49.(0)7000.POSTFIX fax: +49.(0)30.308806-77
- To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo
postfix.org with content (not subject): unsubscribe postfix-users
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]