|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
From: Geir Thomassen (gthomassen
networkgroup.no)Date: Thu Sep 27 2001 - 05:22:56 CDT
Liviu Daia wrote:
> On 27 September 2001, Craig Sanders <cas
taz.net.au> wrote:
>>
>>ext2 would be one of the worst choices for a mail server's filesystem.
>>
>
> Not according to some tests I've seen recently. If you're
> manipulating many small files, ext2 performs consistently better than
> Reiserfs (OTOH, ext2 loses big time for large files --- but that's not
> really relevant here).
>
Namesys optimised ReiserFS for small file application (so users could use
ReiserFS instead of a database). Have a look at:
http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/opensource/library/l-fs.html
--
Regards
Geir
-
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo
postfix.org with content
(not subject): unsubscribe postfix-users
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]