OSEC

Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com
 
From: Wietse Venema (wietseporcupine.org)
Date: Thu Sep 27 2001 - 08:21:19 CDT

  • Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

    Ng Pheng Siong:
    > Does FreeBSD softupdates

    Softupdates have a dramatic effect on the time spent when creating,
    renaming and removing files with FFS. The effect on reading or
    writing files is modest, at most.

    > 1. Alleviate syslog sync'ing?

    That's appending data to a file. Therefore, softupdates have little
    effect, if any effect at all. Softupdates try to avoid disk I/O.
    Synchronous syslogging forces disk I/O to happen.

    > 2. Reduce likelihood of losing logs upon power trip or whatnot?

    I suppose you are comparing FFS with softupdates against FFS without
    softupdates.

    No difference with synchronous syslog writing. Syslogd waits until
    the data is written to disk.

    No difference is expected without synchronous syslog writing.

            Wietse
    -
    To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomopostfix.org with content
    (not subject): unsubscribe postfix-users