OSEC

Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com
 
From: Chip Paswater (turk182chipware.net)
Date: Fri Sep 28 2001 - 01:19:16 CDT

  • Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

    > We have a "Really Big UPS"(tm), so I feel completely comforatble using a ram
    > disk for queues, in fact I played with linux 2.2 and found the the limit to
    > a single ram disks size was 525 Megs. Linux 2.2 has a limit of 2 GB for ram
    > so we found a nice balance with 3 X 525 Ram disks and ~500 Megs of system

    You're talking about a kernel RAMDISK and not one of those solid state
    ramdrives? Performance wise, how do they compare to each other? I'm
    assuming the ramdisk is the fastest because you're not going through an IDE
    bus to get the data...?

    And I assume postfix can handle multiple queue directories? I wouldn't
    mind having a 256M ramdisk for everyday queues, and then a larger 2-3 gig
    queue for the days when I lose a T3 or two. Can I preferentiate the ramdisk
    over the hardisk, so that postfix won't start using the harddisk until the
    256M ramdisk is full?

    -
    To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomopostfix.org with content
    (not subject): unsubscribe postfix-users