|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
From: Chip Paswater (turk182
chipware.net)Date: Fri Sep 28 2001 - 01:19:16 CDT
> We have a "Really Big UPS"(tm), so I feel completely comforatble using a ram
> disk for queues, in fact I played with linux 2.2 and found the the limit to
> a single ram disks size was 525 Megs. Linux 2.2 has a limit of 2 GB for ram
> so we found a nice balance with 3 X 525 Ram disks and ~500 Megs of system
You're talking about a kernel RAMDISK and not one of those solid state
ramdrives? Performance wise, how do they compare to each other? I'm
assuming the ramdisk is the fastest because you're not going through an IDE
bus to get the data...?
And I assume postfix can handle multiple queue directories? I wouldn't
mind having a 256M ramdisk for everyday queues, and then a larger 2-3 gig
queue for the days when I lose a T3 or two. Can I preferentiate the ramdisk
over the hardisk, so that postfix won't start using the harddisk until the
256M ramdisk is full?
-
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo
postfix.org with content
(not subject): unsubscribe postfix-users
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]