|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
From: Jason Baker (jbaker
filonet.ca)Date: Fri Sep 28 2001 - 12:43:39 CDT
On September 28, 2001 10:40 am, you wrote:
> > If I have the choice between using two Postfix instances versus
> > doubling the complexity of Postfix's queue management code, then
> > I will take the two Postfix instance approach any time, because it
> > needs less code and therefore it is more reliable. This may waste
> > a few cycles and bytes.
>
> I was thinking less of the waste of machine resources than the
> waste of administrator time and effort. As things stand now,
> everyone has to figure out this strategy for themselves, or find
> it out from the mailing list. If it were do-able with a configuration
> parameter, it would be much easier to "discover" it.
Perhaps the best of both worlds would be a nice verbose HOWTO on the
subject, included on the website. I'd do it, but I don't run this
configuration so it'd be the blind leading the blind... anyone who is
running in a "slow failover" care to step up to the plate?
-
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo
postfix.org with content
(not subject): unsubscribe postfix-users
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]