|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
From: Jorge Godoy (godoy
conectiva.com)Date: Tue Oct 09 2001 - 16:38:40 CDT
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Ralf Hildebrandt <hildeb
www.stahl.bau.tu-bs.de> writes:
> On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 06:16:58PM -0300, Jorge Godoy wrote:
>
>> I've been reading http://perdition.sourceforge.net/ and thinking about
>> the benefits of that. Is there anybody using something like that? Why
>> using a POP3/IMAP proxy is interesting? Would it provide more security
>> to the network?
>
> It's for load balancing, or for distributing users over a farm of POP
> servers.
Why not using, e.g., DNS to do that? There's also LVS + mon, that's
more reliable in case some server fail. It won't have all the IMAP/POP
protocol overhead...
- --
Godoy. <godoy
conectiva.com>
Solutions Developer - Conectiva Inc. - http://en.conectiva.com
Desenvolvedor de Soluções - Conectiva S.A. - http://www.conectiva.com.br
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.6 and Gnu Privacy Guard <http://www.gnupg.org/>
iD8DBQE7w25eEzC+baSjBiURAuO7AJ9ximgvi15gX77il/t4IpNwuM27vQCgjUDt
FhJUbsdGCXajz6Tx6UmNj2M=
=6Dwr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo
postfix.org with content
(not subject): unsubscribe postfix-users
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]