|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
From: Wietse Venema (wietse
porcupine.org)Date: Tue Nov 06 2001 - 17:37:49 CST
Wietse Venema:
> Liviu Daia:
> > > Sample output:
> > >
> > > Nov 6 12:44:17 bristle postfix/smtpd[5288]: reject_warning:
> > > RCPT from hostname.domain.com[1.2.3.4]: 554 <recipient
domain>:
> > > Recipient address rejected: Access denied; from=<sender
domain>
> > > to=<recipient
domain>
> >
> > The "reject" part in "reject_warning:" is the name of the
> > restriction that triggered the warning, or a fixed string? People
>
> It's fixed right now. The routine that changes reject into a
> reject_warning currently does not know the name of the restriction.
>
> > seem to like spaghetti rules; occasionally it might not be immediately
> > obvious which restriction actually triggered a reject. Having a way to
> > tag the warn_if_reject flags would be nice.
Sounds like a way to tag rejects would be useful in any case,
whether or not a reject will be dumbed down into a warning.
Wietse
-
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo
postfix.org with content
(not subject): unsubscribe postfix-users
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]