|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
From: Matthias Andree (ma
dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de)Date: Sat Dec 01 2001 - 17:22:17 CST
Andreas Hödle <Hoedle
kwsoft.de> writes:
> 1.) ext2 (CPU 70% Idle)
> Client Ready : 0:58 min
> 19 Msg./sec
> Server Ready : 3:13 min (first smtpd -> last mail delivered according to
> logfiles)
Did you have /var/spool/postfix set to +S (check with lsattr) or mount
it sync?
> 2.) jfs (Ver. 1.0.5)
>
> Many errors.
> Dead-Lock on <mailbox>.lck file
> Corrupt files in postfix queue
jfs 1.0.5 is not exactly current. Neither is Linux 2.4.10.
> 4.) ext3
> Client Ready : 4:16 min
> 4,3 Msg./sec
> Server Ready : 6:12 min (first smtpd -> last mail delivered according to
> logfiles)
Again, Linux 2.4.10 is not exactly current. If it was +S as per lsattr
or mounted sync, updating to 2.4.16 may increase throughput. What
journal mode did you use?
> No tests about sync behavior or other advanced stuff.
So the test does not reflect production setups?
-- Matthias Andree"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." Benjamin Franklin - To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo
postfix.org with content (not subject): unsubscribe postfix-users
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]