OSEC

Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com
 
From: Keith Matthews (keith_msweeney.demon.co.uk)
Date: Sun Dec 02 2001 - 02:50:16 CST

  • Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

    On 02 Dec 2001 00:28:26 +0100 Matthias Andree <Matthias Andree <madt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de>> wrote:

    > Considering two out of seven IBM DTLA 307045 drives (one bought in a
    > store, one obtained via mail order from a different company) died here
    > within 9 months after buying them, I'm not quite sure if their HDD
    > department deserves this kind of advertising. Former models (DCAS, DDRS,
    > DPTA, DJNA) were more reliable, or so it seems to me at this time.

    Certainly my own experience with the DCAS and earlier types is that
    they are as reliable as you can get. Not tried the newer ones yet.

    Had some HP ones once, they were awful. So bad I'd never risk it
    again. I suspect they were actually rebranded, but not sure.

    Had a Fujitsu that wasn't too hot either, but may have been a rare
    lemon. 

    --
Keith Matthews
Frequentous Consultants  - Linux Services, 
		Oracle development & database administration

    -
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomopostfix.org with content
(not subject): unsubscribe postfix-users