OSEC

Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com
 
From: adi (adiacme.com)
Date: Sat Feb 02 2002 - 11:42:40 CST

  • Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

    On Sat, Feb 02, 2002 at 07:01:51PM +0200, Liviu Daia wrote:
    > So, your experiment doesn't prove anything, with or without
    > libsyncdir, and with or without synch updates.

    What can I say? :-)

    I don't say that I have anything to prove. But, using libsyncdir,
    I got all of those 1000 mails (note I repeat the test several times).
    I got the same results if I set maildir directory updates synchronously
    (chattr +S). Using mailbox instead of maildir, I got all of those 1000
    mails.

    I guess that, because link/unlik operations on ext2/ext3 isn't
    done 'synchronously' (it do not fsync() parent directory), then using
    maildir on top of those fs is not 'safe'.

    BTW, I already mention that I got more than 1000 mails using
    ext3 before. That information is incomplete (inaccurate) I got
    more than 1000 mails if I disable synchronous updates on postfix's
    spool (using chattr -S) on top of ext3 partition.

    Regards,

    P.Y. Adi Prasaja

    -
    To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomopostfix.org with content
    (not subject): unsubscribe postfix-users