OSEC

Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com
 
From: Alexander Skwar (ASkwarDigitalProjects.com)
Date: Sat Mar 02 2002 - 19:06:15 CST

  • Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

    »Jason Hoos« sagte am 2002-03-02 um 16:12:08 -0600 :
    > The main difference that I can see between mine and Alexander's (I don't
    > remember exactly what Marc's was) is that I use saslauthd for my pw_check
    > method instead of PAM, and I then run the saslauthd daemon with arguments
    > that tell it to use PAM. The reason I did this is because the Postfix smtpd

    Good idea - however I also don't get this to run :( I changed the
    pwcheck_method in the smtpd.conf to saslauthd and restarted saslauthd
    and postfix. I still can't login :( For kicks and giggles I chmod
    666'd /etc/shadow to make sure that there aren't any access problems;
    even with a 666 shadow file PLAIN does not work.

    Can I somehow increase the verbosity level of saslauthd? I'd relly like
    to know why it thinks that the authentication string I sent is wrong.

    > smtpd_sasl_local_domain = mail.thwack.net
    [...]
    > realm: mail.thwack.net

    Hmm. What does realm and smtpd_sasl_local_domain mean? First I didn't
    have a realm entry in my smtpd.conf file. I then added it to contain
    the same string as sasl_local_dom does. sasl_local_dom is set to
    "$myhostname" (without the ").

    Alexander Skwar

    -- 
    How to quote:	http://learn.to/quote (german) http://quote.6x.to (english)
    Homepage:	http://www.iso-top.de      |     Jabber: askwarcharente.de
       iso-top.de - Die günstige Art an Linux Distributionen zu kommen
                           Uptime: 16 hours 0 minutes
    -
    To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomopostfix.org with content
    (not subject): unsubscribe postfix-users