|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
From: Alexander Skwar (ASkwar
DigitalProjects.com)Date: Sat Mar 02 2002 - 19:06:15 CST
»Jason Hoos« sagte am 2002-03-02 um 16:12:08 -0600 :
> The main difference that I can see between mine and Alexander's (I don't
> remember exactly what Marc's was) is that I use saslauthd for my pw_check
> method instead of PAM, and I then run the saslauthd daemon with arguments
> that tell it to use PAM. The reason I did this is because the Postfix smtpd
Good idea - however I also don't get this to run :( I changed the
pwcheck_method in the smtpd.conf to saslauthd and restarted saslauthd
and postfix. I still can't login :( For kicks and giggles I chmod
666'd /etc/shadow to make sure that there aren't any access problems;
even with a 666 shadow file PLAIN does not work.
Can I somehow increase the verbosity level of saslauthd? I'd relly like
to know why it thinks that the authentication string I sent is wrong.
> smtpd_sasl_local_domain = mail.thwack.net
[...]
> realm: mail.thwack.net
Hmm. What does realm and smtpd_sasl_local_domain mean? First I didn't
have a realm entry in my smtpd.conf file. I then added it to contain
the same string as sasl_local_dom does. sasl_local_dom is set to
"$myhostname" (without the ").
Alexander Skwar
-- How to quote: http://learn.to/quote (german) http://quote.6x.to (english) Homepage: http://www.iso-top.de | Jabber: askwarcharente.de iso-top.de - Die günstige Art an Linux Distributionen zu kommen Uptime: 16 hours 0 minutes - To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo
postfix.org with content (not subject): unsubscribe postfix-users
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]