|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
From: Alan Hodgson (ahodgson
simkin.ca)Date: Fri Mar 08 2002 - 12:34:41 CST
On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 11:17:34AM -0700, Robin Lynn Frank wrote:
> And the privacy of the recipient is of no consequence? We recently got an
> email from a firm that was offering a CD-ROM of "recently verified live"
> email addresses. It was caught by our UCE traps and bounced to our
> postmaster account rather than the sender so we didn't wind up on the next
> "live" addresses. Look at the UCE related posts on this list. Do you really
> think that people are going to all this blacklist, header and body_check
> effort only to turn around and notify the spammer that they have alive
> address???
There are far better ways to deal with UCE that do not impact the
reliability of normal E-mail.
Besides, the only means I know of for a spammer to create such a list is to
use embedded HTML bugs. If you truly value your privacy you should not use
an HTML-aware E-mail reader. It's not like spammers send mail from real
envelope sender addresses (at least not their own).
-- "When Government fears the people, it's liberty. When people fear the Government, it's tyranny." -- Benjamin Franklin- To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo
postfix.org with content (not subject): unsubscribe postfix-users
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]