|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
From: Alastair Sherringham (alastair
calliope.demon.co.uk)Date: Sat Mar 09 2002 - 15:22:41 CST
On Sat, Mar 09, 2002 at 05:20:41PM +0100, Roelof Osinga wrote:
>
> Ok, be gentle, just a question <g>.
>
> When talking about headers is there not a difference between a
> Reply-To header and the Return-Path header? Does not RFC 2821
> only grant the removal of the latter, not the former?
I read that as an obvious typo. 'Return-Path' was meant throughout.
Cheers,
-- AS | alastaircalliope.demon.co.uk | http://www.calliope.demon.co.uk | PGP Key : A9DE69F8 ------------------------------------------------------------------- - To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo
postfix.org with content (not subject): unsubscribe postfix-users
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]