|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
From: Guido Van De Velde (Guido.VanDeVelde
cc.kuleuven.ac.be)Date: Tue Apr 09 2002 - 04:05:42 CDT
Given these postfix logs :
Apr 9 10:07:16 pollux postfix/smtpd[23481]: connect from
pcd367193.netvigator.com[203.218.157.193]
Apr 9 10:07:18 pollux postfix/smtpd[23481]: 396FC3FC80:
client=pcd367193.netvigator.com[203.218.157.193]
Apr 9 10:07:29 pollux postfix/cleanup[23485]: 396FC3FC80:
message-id=<WBuC
mail.ht.net.tw>
Apr 9 10:07:29 pollux postfix/qmgr[20741]: 396FC3FC80:
from=<candyxmaker
yahoo.com>, size=714, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
Apr 9 10:07:29 pollux postfix/smtp[23513]: 396FC3FC80:
to=<ivo
onyx.arts.kuleuven.ac.be>,
relay=cav.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be[134.58.240.42], delay=11, status=sent
(250 Requested mail action okay, completed)
Apr 9 10:07:31 pollux postfix/smtpd[23481]: disconnect from
pcd367193.netvigator.com[203.218.157.193]
They seem very normal : machine pollux (postfix server) receives mail
and send it to the next hop, cav.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be. The from seems
OK, the to is indeed an existing colleage of mine. He sends me the
headers of the mail :
> Return-Path: <candyxmaker
yahoo.com>
> From: Candy
pollux.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be,
> Manufacturer
pollux.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be
> To: BE
pollux.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be
> Subject: Jelly Pop
The rest doen't matter much, i guess, but for sake of completeness :
> Received: from <blabla>
> by <blabla> with ESMTP id g3987TD07963
> for <ivo
onyx.arts.kuleuven.ac.be>; Tue, 9 Apr 2002 10:07:29
+0200
> Received: from <blabla>
> by <blabla> with SMTP id KAA32428
> for <ivo
onyx.arts.kuleuven.ac.be>; Tue, 9 Apr 2002 10:07:29
+0200
> Received: through <blabla> SMTP Relay 1016030237; Tue Apr 09 10:07:29
2002
> Received: from oemcomputer (pcd367193.netvigator.com [203.218.157.193])
> by pollux.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 396FC3FC80
> for <ivo
onyx.arts.kuleuven.ac.be>; Tue, 9 Apr 2002 10:07:18
+0200 (CEST)
> Received: from microsoft
> by tpts5.seed.net.tw with SMTP id C0lzea0yoXNrJ223yrc9AF;
> Tue, 09 Apr 2002 16:08:51 +0800
> Message-ID: <WBuC
mail.ht.net.tw>
> X-Mailer: NbgSSRAceFCI5FXq3b
> Content-Type: text/plain;
> X-Priority: 3
> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2002 10:07:18 +0200 (CEST)
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> X-MIME-Autoconverted: from Quoted-Printable to 8bit by
> onyx.arts.kuleuven.ac.be id g3987TD07963
> Status:
> X-Mozilla-Status: 8001
> X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000
> X-UIDL: 3626dd480000801e
Perhaps I should know the answers already, but I'm a little confused
now. So I have some questions about this :
1) Where do the from and the to in the final headers come from ?
2) How is it possible a message with a to
"be
pollux.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be" get delivered at
"ivo
onyx.arts.kuleuven.ac.be" These addresses are both "user
machine"
addresses, two completely independant systems, a non-existing user be
and an existing user ivo.
3) Is here a security problem ?
4) Can I avoid these kind of tricks ?
Any suggestions are welcome.
-- guido- To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo
postfix.org with content (not subject): unsubscribe postfix-users
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]