|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
From: Andreas Piesk (a.piesk
gmx.net)Date: Tue Apr 23 2002 - 17:23:56 CDT
Tuesday, April 23, 2002, 11:52:23 PM, Peter Barnwell wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 Apr 2002 10:15 pm, you wrote:
>> hiho,
>>
>> i have plans to put pam-based authentication into postfix.
>> yes, i know, it's possible to use pam via sasl, but i'm not satisfied
>> with that solution. many people use pam based authentication only
>> (mysql, ldap, kerberos, etc.) and don't need the extra sasl layer.
>> so i want to get rid of sasl, because i don't need it.
>>
> Am I correct in assuming that you intend to re-write the relevant postfix
> code to enable Postfix to do smtp auth without sasl? If so I agree with you
> that this would be a good idea, although my plan was to use MySQL as the sole
> auth mechanism. sasl seems to add an immense overhead for what is essentialy
> a pretty trivial operation.
ok, not rewriting. i think about adding the pam code so it could be enabled
by DEFS like the sasl code. i agree with you, sasl seems a little bit
overkill for smtp authentication.
but i think, using mysql as the sole auth mech (this implies you put the
necessary mysql calls in postfix) isn't a good idea. if something in
the mysql interface changes, you have to touch the postfix code. using a
auth layer like pam you only have to change the module.
ciao -ap
-- Andreas Piesk a.pieskgmx.net PGP-Fingerprint: 23CB A7E2 2E53 373C DBCD 8EFC 7777 61C1
- To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo
postfix.org with content (not subject): unsubscribe postfix-users
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]