OSEC

Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com
 
From: lst_hoe (lst_hoekwsoft.de)
Date: Tue Jul 02 2002 - 03:23:44 CDT

  • Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

    At 09:46 02.07.2002 +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
    >On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 09:32:44AM +0200, lst_hoe wrote:
    >
    >> I would say accepting the "MAIL FROM:<<<stuff>>>" results from this
    behavior
    >> [Quoting change-log]
    >> >19990510
    >> > Feature: UCE restrictions are always delayed until RCPT
    >> > TO, VRFY or ETRN. To change back to the default specify
    >> > "smtpd_delay_reject = no" in /etc/postfix/main.cf.
    >
    >This has nothing to do with it. This merely delays a reject, not
    >disabling it.

    As i understand the posting from Michael Tokarev the question was why the
    response-code from postfix is 250 after the "MAIL FROM:" with a wrong
    address-format and the 504 after the "RCPT TO:" with correct format.
    According to the transcript of session the message was rejected as it
    should be anyway.
    The second question was why the address in the "MAIL FROM:" line is altered
    to a form with 3 "<" starting and 3 ">" closing and in the line with
    reject-code 504 the address is show as it really was with 1 "<" and 2 ">"
    and that´s why it was rejected.

    Michael Tokarev do you agree or have i completely missed you?

    Thanxs

    --
    

    Andreas Hödle

    Kühn & Weyh Software GmbH

    WWW.KWSOFT.DE

    - To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomopostfix.org with content (not subject): unsubscribe postfix-users