OSEC

Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com
 
From: Phil Howard (phil-postfix-usersipal.net)
Date: Tue Jul 02 2002 - 07:46:58 CDT

  • Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

    On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 11:30:29AM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:

    | On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 04:23:27AM -0500, Phil Howard wrote:
    |
    | > | Because all data could be in all maps. What you want would probably an
    | > | LDAP server (search only in the ou=domain or something like that)
    | >
    | > I have no plans to add an LDAP server, nor an SQL server.
    |
    | But it would be exactly what your requirements dictate.

    I didn't list all the requirements. They aren't all written down
    in one place, and they didn't all seem appropriate here, either.
    Some of the requirements do include having a minimum of things to
    administer, a minimum of things to debug, and a minimum of things
    exposed to failing.

    | > Is there a Postfix man page that lists all the other Postfix man pages?
    |
    | Unfortunately no. maybe "man postfix" should do that!

    It would be a help, even if it just gives subtopics when then have
    the list of other man pages.

    | > Your experience and my experience aren't the same, apparently. Now I've
    | > only been using it for half a year, but it has been rock solid reliable
    | > and I have not lost a single thing. I have lost data occaisionally with
    | > ext2.
    |
    | We've been using ext3 for over a year now on our main server
    | (hauptpostamt.charite.de). During that time I've been following
    | ReiserFS development closely -- I think ReiserFS's complexity (too
    | much code) is just too high.
    |
    | Although reliability has risen in the past (a recent test in the
    | German c't mag showed that ReiserFS, ext3 and XFS are probably the
    | most reliable choices).

    How well does ext3 deal with 3000000 files in a single directory?
    How well does ext3 deal with 3000000 files that have no more than
    16 bytes each? These capabilities in ReiserFS have helped in a few
    projects already. I am at 3.6 in Linux 2.4.18 and it has been good
    to me so far. It's even dealt with messy issues like files that are
    the executeable images of running processes being deleted, rebooting,
    and cleaning up properly afterwards. Maybe some of that extra code
    is what helps do things like tail packing. But I consider it a good
    feature to have.

    -- 
    -----------------------------------------------------------------
    | Phil Howard - KA9WGN |   Dallas   | http://linuxhomepage.com/ |
    | phil-nospamipal.net | Texas, USA | http://phil.ipal.org/     |
    -----------------------------------------------------------------
    -
    To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomopostfix.org with content
    (not subject): unsubscribe postfix-users