|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
From: Alex van den Bogaerdt (alex_at_ergens.op.HET.NET)
Date: Wed Jul 17 2002 - 08:37:05 CDT
Scott Henderson wrote:
> >Isn't this something you could/should do in spamassassin? You
> >may need to modify it a bit but it seems to me that when the
> >decision is made to modify the "Subject:" header, you may as
> >well modify the recipient...
>
> I don't believe so. spamassassin only tags emails in this way,
> inserting this text in the subject line. It isn't designed to
> actually DO anything else with the mail. It's supposed to hand
> the tagged mail off to a mail server for handling.
I understand. However, postfix content filtering assumes the
filter modifies (or even bounces) the email.
Maybe there are other ways to achieve what you want, I still think
modifying spamassassin (if necessery at all, I dunno) is a valid
way to achieve your goal. A similar way of course would be to
hand the mail over to yet another daemon which then does the
'hard work'. smtp->postfix->spamassasin->otherfilter->postfix
Others: please step in if you know a better way, using postfix.
I'm interested in this subject too, so please do so on the list.
> >On the spamassassin topic, have you tested it with large emails,
> >say 5 MB or so? If so: what was the result? If not: please try
> >and let me know.
>
> Haven't yet, but I will be. Email me in a month or so and ask
> and I'll let you know.
Will do, TIA.
cheers,
Alex
-
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo
postfix.org with content
(not subject): unsubscribe postfix-users
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]