OSEC

Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com
 
From: Alex van den Bogaerdt (alex_at_ergens.op.HET.NET)
Date: Wed Jul 17 2002 - 08:37:05 CDT

  • Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

    Scott Henderson wrote:

    > >Isn't this something you could/should do in spamassassin? You
    > >may need to modify it a bit but it seems to me that when the
    > >decision is made to modify the "Subject:" header, you may as
    > >well modify the recipient...
    >
    > I don't believe so. spamassassin only tags emails in this way,
    > inserting this text in the subject line. It isn't designed to
    > actually DO anything else with the mail. It's supposed to hand
    > the tagged mail off to a mail server for handling.

    I understand. However, postfix content filtering assumes the
    filter modifies (or even bounces) the email.

    Maybe there are other ways to achieve what you want, I still think
    modifying spamassassin (if necessery at all, I dunno) is a valid
    way to achieve your goal. A similar way of course would be to
    hand the mail over to yet another daemon which then does the
    'hard work'. smtp->postfix->spamassasin->otherfilter->postfix

    Others: please step in if you know a better way, using postfix.

    I'm interested in this subject too, so please do so on the list.

    > >On the spamassassin topic, have you tested it with large emails,
    > >say 5 MB or so? If so: what was the result? If not: please try
    > >and let me know.
    >
    > Haven't yet, but I will be. Email me in a month or so and ask
    > and I'll let you know.

    Will do, TIA.

    cheers,
    Alex
    -
    To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomopostfix.org with content
    (not subject): unsubscribe postfix-users