Yes, but in this case I believe there is a commercial purpose involved.

Also, RAV may not (in reality) have a mailbox limit (their site makes it
sound otherwise, but not the biggest issue here) but it is still licensed by
the domain and if you are hosting multiple domains it becomes real expensive
real fast.

Kaperski is real expensive too. Both these products are $$ oriented with
their licensing scheme. (Reminds me to much of M$!)

I am interested in the workstation license idea mentioned before, wouldn't
running that license be at the very least shaky if you were using it for
this purpose? I realize it will do the job (and many offer free or
relatively inexpensive workstation versions) but on a Linux box being used
as a commercial mail server the fact that it works doesn't exactly meet the
intended license. I suppose the AV company won't know what it's product is
scanning and otherwise happy a license has been purchased for the updates
being accessed.

I'm looking for the same thing; to try and get my mail server legally
licensed. I don't have the money being talked about for either Kaperski or
RAV. I host a dozen domains or so and less than a hundred mailboxes but
expect that number to rise!

----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Leone" <turgonmike-leone.com>
To: <postfix-userspostfix.org>
Sent: Saturday, July 20, 2002 11:19 AM
Subject: Re: Kaperski (AVP) vs Ravantivirus

-
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomopostfix.org with content
(not subject): unsubscribe postfix-users

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]