Jorge Godoy wrote:
> Patrick McKane <pmckanesmtp.caseinc.net> writes:
 
> > Ummm... Why was my message designated as spam? It may have been
> > a stupid or uninformed question, but it was genuine and not some
> > attempt to spam the list....
>
> This is a mark done by SpamAssassin.
>
> I think your message was regarded as SPAM here too...

Since Ralph mentioned getting de-listed, it sounds likely that the OP is
listed in one or more blocklists, which probably inflated the
Spamassassin score (I don't run moderated lists through SA, so I have no
idea).

http://relays.osirusoft.com/cgi-bin/rbcheck.cgi shows 207.79.232.3 as
being listed in a number of blocklists for being an open relay.

http://dsbl.org/listing.php?207.79.232.3

Doing a quick check, the machine now seems to pass a simple relaying
test, so you might want to submit your IP for re-testing.

<pedantic>
It's spam (or Spam), not SPAM.
http://www.spam.com/ci/ci_in.htm
</pedantic>

-- 
Will Yardley
input: william <  hq . newdream . net . >
-
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomopostfix.org with content
(not subject): unsubscribe postfix-users

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]