|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
From: Schmehl, Paul L (pauls_at_utdallas.edu)
Date: Sun Sep 01 2002 - 21:35:19 CDT
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steve Manes [mailto:smanes
magpie.com]
> Sent: Sunday, September 01, 2002 7:33 PM
> To: postfix-users
postfix.org
> Subject: RE: Using blacklists and RBL's with Postfix
>
> Rather than
> toss every message containing that string, it would be
> weighed against
> other words in the message which would, at least in the case
> of a resume,
> drive down the scoring to probably an acceptable number.
>
This is precisely what makes the idea so intriguing. It's the
*cumulative* effect of the 15 most conspiquous words that makes a
message "spam" or "not spam". This avoids the very problem mentioned of
the graduation with honors "mistake".
BTW, I would never advocate that anyone use my filters verbatim. I'm
filtering for precisely *three* people; myself and the husband and wife
owners of the site, and we have *very* similar standards when it comes
to what constitutes spam. The larger the "audience", the less you can
use single words to filter.
Paul Schmehl (pauls
utdallas.edu)
Project Coordinator
University of Texas at Dallas
http://www.utdallas.edu/~pauls/
AVIEN Founding Member
-
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo
postfix.org with content
(not subject): unsubscribe postfix-users
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]