>>>>> "PLS" == Paul L Schmehl <Schmehl> writes:

PLS> I think the single most significant aspect of his research is the 0
PLS> false positives result. That alone makes it worth pursuing.

That assumes you have the time and inclination (and wherewithall) to
generate a statistical description of *your* personal mail patterns.
You can do this today with spamassassin -- just forget the scores
published by the project and tune it with scores derived from your
personal sampling of mail. It will much better match your definition
of spam that way.

That and you have to continually tune it by giving it more samples of
spam andn non-spam as they evolve.

I don't see statistical techniques like this working on a server-level
with multiple types of users, unless they are applied per-user.
-
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomopostfix.org with content
(not subject): unsubscribe postfix-users

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]