|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
From: Adrian Bolzan (Adrian.Bolzan_at_aot.com.au)
Date: Mon Sep 23 2002 - 22:04:23 CDT
On 23 Sep 2002 at 21:48, Stephen Hoover wrote:
> Sorry for the extreme newbie conceptual nature of my last couple of
> emails, moving into something like Spam Assassin is very new to me. Is
> Spam Assassin meant to replace (eliminate, supercede, etc) Postfix's
> header and body checks, or should they work in conjunction?
>
I use them together, although I am sure there are situations in which you
could roll all body and header checks into SpamAssassin.
1. we use SpamAssassin and Amavisd to catch spam and forward it to a
central e-mail address.
2. We use header checks to block e-mail from specific e-mail addresses
from arriving in user's mailboxes.
3. We use body-checks as a first step in blocking virus-laden e-emails,
checking for the existence of certain filenames in the body of the
message (e.g. *.src, *.vba, etc.)
We could probably do Step 2 in SpamAssassin but we like it this way.
Cheers,
adrian
> Stephen Hoover
> Dallas, Texas
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo
postfix.org with content
> (not subject): unsubscribe postfix-users
-
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo
postfix.org with content
(not subject): unsubscribe postfix-users
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]