On 1 October 2002, Clifton Royston <cliftonrlava.net> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 01:31:47PM -0500, Michael Jarvis wrote:
[...]
> > In the email you replied to, I was merely illustrating to Michael
> > Brennen (mbrennenfni.com) that "IGNORE" wouldn't give me the
> > functionality I need.
> >
> > I've downloaded the source to postfix-1.1.11-20020928 and I'm
> > looking to see how hard it would be to have "OK" cease all
> > body_check processing.
>
> I believe there have been patches discussed which add an additional
> verb to do this, but since I'm not using either header_checks or
> body_checks I haven't looked into them.

    Yes, all this has been beaten to death, in various flavors and at
excruciating length, several times in the past. No, nobody has produced
any patch so far. The reason was, nobody was able to come up with a
design that meets two basic requirements:

(1) the checks should lead to predictable results (that is: the OK /
    REJECT result doesn't depend on the order of the lines in header /
    body);

(2) the checks don't require the messages to be scanned several times.

    Regards,

    Liviu Daia

-- 
Dr. Liviu Daia               e-mail:   Liviu.Daiaimar.ro
Institute of Mathematics     web page: http://www.imar.ro/~daia
of the Romanian Academy      PGP key:  http://www.imar.ro/~daia/daia.asc
-
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomopostfix.org with content
(not subject): unsubscribe postfix-users

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]