|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
From: Michael Jarvis (michael_at_jarvis.com)
Date: Tue Oct 01 2002 - 15:44:33 CDT
On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 11:24:50PM +0300, Liviu Daia wrote:
> > I believe there have been patches discussed which add an additional
> > verb to do this, but since I'm not using either header_checks or
> > body_checks I haven't looked into them.
>
> Yes, all this has been beaten to death, in various flavors and at
> excruciating length, several times in the past. No, nobody has produced
> any patch so far. The reason was, nobody was able to come up with a
> design that meets two basic requirements:
>
> (1) the checks should lead to predictable results (that is: the OK /
> REJECT result doesn't depend on the order of the lines in header /
> body);
>
> (2) the checks don't require the messages to be scanned several times.
So currently does Postfix apply all body_check rules to each line,
scanning the message once?
If so, that would explain the current behavior.
-- Michael Jarvis michaeljarvis.com http://www.jarvis.com/home.php "Freiheit stirbt in kleinen Stücken." - To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo
postfix.org with content (not subject): unsubscribe postfix-users
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
jarvis.com