OSEC

Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com
 
From: Michael Jarvis (michael_at_jarvis.com)
Date: Tue Oct 01 2002 - 15:44:33 CDT

  • Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

    On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 11:24:50PM +0300, Liviu Daia wrote:
    > > I believe there have been patches discussed which add an additional
    > > verb to do this, but since I'm not using either header_checks or
    > > body_checks I haven't looked into them.
    >
    > Yes, all this has been beaten to death, in various flavors and at
    > excruciating length, several times in the past. No, nobody has produced
    > any patch so far. The reason was, nobody was able to come up with a
    > design that meets two basic requirements:
    >
    > (1) the checks should lead to predictable results (that is: the OK /
    > REJECT result doesn't depend on the order of the lines in header /
    > body);
    >
    > (2) the checks don't require the messages to be scanned several times.

    So currently does Postfix apply all body_check rules to each line,
    scanning the message once?

    If so, that would explain the current behavior.

    -- 
    Michael Jarvis
    michaeljarvis.com
    http://www.jarvis.com/home.php
    "Freiheit stirbt in kleinen Stücken."
    -
    To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomopostfix.org with content
    (not subject): unsubscribe postfix-users