On 1 October 2002, Michael Jarvis <michaeljarvis.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 11:24:50PM +0300, Liviu Daia wrote:
> > > I believe there have been patches discussed which add an additional
> > > verb to do this, but since I'm not using either header_checks or
> > > body_checks I haven't looked into them.
> >
> > Yes, all this has been beaten to death, in various flavors and at
> > excruciating length, several times in the past. No, nobody has produced
> > any patch so far. The reason was, nobody was able to come up with a
> > design that meets two basic requirements:
> >
> > (1) the checks should lead to predictable results (that is: the OK /
> > REJECT result doesn't depend on the order of the lines in header /
> > body);
> >
> > (2) the checks don't require the messages to be scanned several times.
>
> So currently does Postfix apply all body_check rules to each line,
> scanning the message once?

    Yes.

> If so, that would explain the current behavior.

    Yes. :-)

    Regards,

    Liviu Daia

-- 
Dr. Liviu Daia               e-mail:   Liviu.Daiaimar.ro
Institute of Mathematics     web page: http://www.imar.ro/~daia
of the Romanian Academy      PGP key:  http://www.imar.ro/~daia/daia.asc
-
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomopostfix.org with content
(not subject): unsubscribe postfix-users

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]