|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
From: 'Simon White' (simon_at_mtds.com)
Date: Thu Oct 17 2002 - 10:20:59 CDT
17-Oct-02 at 17:19, Boniforti Flavio (boniforti.f
co-ver.it) wrote :
>
> > > So you mean adding accounts without shell access can't harm to my
> > > system, as long as daemons are chrooted (which is my case)?
> >
> > No, shell access to a machine is always a potential exploit hole.
> > Production servers should be accessible at most by sysadmins
> > via SSH or
> > Webmin over SSL, nothing else.
>
> Yeah, that's my case: I mean, nobody has shell access to my machine,
> except for me (SysAdmin) via SSH. The mailusers have /bin/false as their
> shell...
Sorry, I misread your last paragraph. I thought it said "adding accounts
with shell access"...
-- [Simon White. vim/mutt. simonmtds.com. GIMPS:31.04% see www.mersenne.org] Recognizing disagreements in belief requires having enough agreements in belief to translate or understand the words and deeds of my opponent. -- Anthony O'Hear (combining, somewhat, several modern philosophers). - To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo
postfix.org with content (not subject): unsubscribe postfix-users
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]