At 10:37 AM 11/30/2002, you wrote:
> > > > What you are looking for is the wirehub list. This is a comprehensive
> > > > list (106016 lines) of spammer addresses and domains in the same format
> > > > as you describe but as an access list rather than header or body
> > > > checks.
> > > >
> > > > I use this list and it works EXTREMELY well.
> > > >
> > > > You can obtain the list by using the following script. It retrieves
> > > > the changes to the list via rsync and changes the REJECT to a 550
> > > > message so you can tell it was the wirehub list that did the reject.
> > > >
> > > > #!/bin/bash
> > > > cd /etc/postfix
> > > > rsync -z rsync://doema.wirehub.nl:6666/spamblock/spamlist-extended.txt
> > > > spamlist-extended.txt
> > > > sed 's/REJECT$/550 Wirehub list/' spamlist-extended.txt
> > > >
> > > > >spamlist-extended.tmp
> > > >
> > > > postmap spamlist-extended.tmp && mv spamlist-extended.tmp.db wirehub.db
> > > > && rm spamlist-extended.tmp
> > > >
> > > > Check out http://basic.wirehub.nl/spamstats.html for details on the
> > > > Wirehub list.
> > >
> > >We rsync that list houry.
> >
> > Does the Wirehub list have a good record of not having a lot of false
> > positives?
> >
> > Does the list change frequently enough to warrant an hourly update? If it
> > is run once daily, how many changes would there be, on average, from the
> > previous day?
> >
> > Larry
>
>I haven't encountered problems with it (false positive, I mean). We rsync
>hourly, but if there is nothing to update, rsync just quits as it is supposed
>to.

Thanks!

Larry

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]