OSEC

Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com
 
From: Bill James (bill_at_ibill.no-ip.org)
Date: Thu Jan 02 2003 - 11:50:36 CST

  • Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

    Sorry Simon,

       I am used to ping times in the area of 20 - 50 ms so when I see times
    above 500ms then I start looking for more. Guess I should have worded it
    differently

    I agree there is some upstream issues with the connection as packet times
    are varied
    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Simon White" <simonmtds.com>
    To: <postfix-userspostfix.org>
    Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 12:42 PM
    Subject: Re: urgent !!! problem receiving mails from hotmail

    > 02-Jan-03 at 12:36, Bill James (billibill.no-ip.org) wrote :
    > > Here is a trace from the far side of my cable modem...Times are VERY
    high
    > > once you get close to you
    > > 24 202.41.225.34 (202.41.225.34) 500.919 ms 502.656 ms 500.510 ms
    >
    > Call 500ms high? Obviously never been the wrong side of a satellite link
    > then. A lot of places in Africa I've been to don't get less than about
    > 800ms to anywhere.
    >
    > DNS lookups are working here now. They'll be cached for the TTL value so
    > clearly that should be OK.
    >
    > I think this is probably a transitory problem, maybe a DNS not
    > responding for a while, or some cache pollution somewhere due to a bad
    > entry.
    >
    > A few hops from a trace from here:-
    >
    > 12 202.183.72.182 (202.183.72.182) 456.167 ms 463.511 ms 462.259 ms
    > 13 202.41.225.34 (202.41.225.34) 607.545 ms 600.297 ms 611.907 ms
    > 14 unassigned-31-66-109-203.worldgatein.com (203.109.66.31) 485.743 ms
    > 490.235 ms 483.796 ms
    > 15 mx1.worldgate.co.in (203.109.64.24) 458.024 ms 547.959 ms 464.095
    > ms
    >
    > Seems that there may be congestion upstream though, since there's a lot
    > of variance in times between two packets
    >
    > >From a ping summary:
    > 22 packets transmitted, 21 packets received, 4% packet loss
    > round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 451.829/456.372/471.314/5.163 ms
    >
    > So there may be a bit of packet loss / congestion... is your link
    > saturated upstream?
    >
    > --
    > [Simon White. vim/mutt. simonmtds.com. Foldinghome no log script yet...]
    > It is impossible to sharpen a pencil with a blunt axe. It is equally vain
    > to try to do it with ten blunt axes instead. -- E. W. Dijkstra
    > [Linux user #170823 http://counter.li.org. Home cooked signature rotator.]